Skip to main content

The Postal Hobby

It feels somewhat strange to read that sentence:
I ... went to university and Dip faded from my life. 
I wasn't the most involved of people at Uni.  To some extent that was because the societies at Sheffield University in the early-80s weren't very interesting.  There wasn't a Diplomacy Society... not even a board game society.  And this was pre-internet effectively.

In fact, it wasn't until the early-90s that I really got back into Diplomacy.  At that point, I was in the early stages of my career (or what I thought would be my career) in teaching, had my own place with a loft bedroom-come-study where I did my work.

One Christmas I wandered into a toy store and was perusing the board games.  I spotted a copy of Diplomacy - a different box but, from the illustrations on the back, the same board and pieces.  And it included a flyer about the postal hobby.

Wait.  What?  Postal play???  If wtf had existed then, I'd have thought WTF!?!?!  I mean... Diplomacy played by post???

Now, I was used to what were loosely called computers by then.  I mean, "loosely called" in comparison to today's.  While I had been studying to become a teacher I'd used an Apple Macintosh.  When I'd finished the course, I'd had to pass it on to the school at which I'd done my training.  So I'd bought myself what I could afford to replace it - a bog-standard wordprocessor.  So, you know, my often illegible handwriting wouldn't need translating.

Despite the fact that I still had my original game, I bought a second game.  And I read the flyer.  And I sent off for the first copy of my first Dip zine.

At that point the zine wasn't named.  It was aimed specifically at Dip newbies (OK, newbies didn't exist back then, either).  It was published by Danny Collman.

I didn't know much about Danny then.  In fairness, I don't know much about him now.  But he's my hero.

One of the first thing he wanted us from-the-start contributors to do was name his zine.  I went for the name Proteus because, over the few issues the format kept changing.  I wasn't successful, though, and the zine became known as Springboard.

Danny opened my horizons.  I got involved in my first PBM game, and the excitement of playing against 6 other players, and of writing and receiving letters from them, especially waiting for them to come through the post, was thrilling.

Zines hosted games.  Danny's games were quite forgiving.  You sent him your orders, your press, and the zine game back with the posted results.  The only thing I found frustrating about this format in publishing was the predictive nature of what you might want to do as far as retreats and adjustments went.

The other frustrating thing about postal play, of course, was that it was common for letters to pass in the post.  I'd send a letter to another player, and receive a letter from him a couple of days later... which had no reference to what I'd sent because he had written at the same time I had!

But, well, so what?  I'm playing 7-player Diplomacy, ffs!  (This post is quickly filling with anachronisms.)

Part of Danny's reason for producing Springboard was that it introduced new players to the Hobby, specifically in the UK.  There was information on and about conventions in the UK, the EDC and WDC.  There were articles from eastablished Dippyists.  There were adverts for other zines.

After a while I jumped into it.  I subscribed to Dolchstoß, published by Richard Sharp.  I subscribed to Stephen Agar's Spring Offensive.  I think I subscribed to subscribed to another one but I can't remember which - sorry.

But, you know, life gets in the way.  I became more established in my profession, was promoted... and time disappeared.  And Diplomacy again faded away...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tournament Scoring - Part 5: Other Scoring Systems

There are, perhaps, three other types of scoring system: Placement or Rank scoring, hybrid systems that seek to combine DSS and SCS, and Tier scoring systems.  I want to have a look at each system. Placement or Rank systems Essentially, these are Supply Centre Scoring systems with the addition of bonus points.  I'm going to have a look at some more regularly used systems.  Again, here is the map I will use as an example: England  - 12 SCs Russia  - 9 SCs Turkey  - 8 SCs Italy  - 5 SCs France ,  Germany   and  Austria-Hungary   were eliminated, with 0 SCs each. C-Diplo In a drawn game points are awarded for: Participating in the game: 1 (for an online tournament, I'd only award this for participating and not surrendering). Each SC held at the end of the game: 1 . The player that 'tops the board' (has the most SCs): 38 pts. The second placed player (second highest number of SCs): 14 pts. The third placed player: 7 pts. If players are

WHAT IS DIPLOMACY? - Part 5: Variants

A variant is a game of Diplomacy where the rules or context are different from the standard game as designed by Allan B Calhamer.  There are three types of variants: context variants, map variants and rules variants. Context Variants Context variants are those games that are played with a wider context.  They may be tournament games, other scored games, or remote format  games.  These aren't often recognised as variants as such, as variants tend to be within the other two types discussed below.  But the context the game is being played in will have an impact on how some players will play the game, and so they are certainly a variation of Dip. Maybe they should be called "variations" rather than variants but does it really matter? Map Variants Diplomacy has been adapted to different maps, or boards.  Not surprising as the general idea of the game, pitting competing powers against each other in a localised region and time in history, can be adapted to any number

Tournament Scoring - Part 7: The Mystery Scoring System

Introducing the Mystery Scoring System.  This is a name that reflects that the actual points scored isn't known until the tournament is over. OK, enough.  Let's get to it.  Here's a breakdown of what the system looks like. The Mystery scoring system The Mystery scoring system is based on DIAS games, where all survivors share in the draw.  (I have modified it to work with non-DIAS games.) In a draw , all players involved in the draw score 100  points. For games which are non-DIAS, players that survive but who are not part of the draw receive 10 points. Eliminated players receive 0 points. If a game ends in a solo, all other players receive 0 points. Solos are scored using the following process: Find the sum of all points scored in games which end in a draw. Divide this total by the number of games that ended in the draw - the average number of points awarded. Divide the average number of points above by the number of games that ended in a solo. Each