Skip to main content

The Postal Hobby

It feels somewhat strange to read that sentence:
I ... went to university and Dip faded from my life. 
I wasn't the most involved of people at Uni.  To some extent that was because the societies at Sheffield University in the early-80s weren't very interesting.  There wasn't a Diplomacy Society... not even a board game society.  And this was pre-internet effectively.

In fact, it wasn't until the early-90s that I really got back into Diplomacy.  At that point, I was in the early stages of my career (or what I thought would be my career) in teaching, had my own place with a loft bedroom-come-study where I did my work.

One Christmas I wandered into a toy store and was perusing the board games.  I spotted a copy of Diplomacy - a different box but, from the illustrations on the back, the same board and pieces.  And it included a flyer about the postal hobby.

Wait.  What?  Postal play???  If wtf had existed then, I'd have thought WTF!?!?!  I mean... Diplomacy played by post???

Now, I was used to what were loosely called computers by then.  I mean, "loosely called" in comparison to today's.  While I had been studying to become a teacher I'd used an Apple Macintosh.  When I'd finished the course, I'd had to pass it on to the school at which I'd done my training.  So I'd bought myself what I could afford to replace it - a bog-standard wordprocessor.  So, you know, my often illegible handwriting wouldn't need translating.

Despite the fact that I still had my original game, I bought a second game.  And I read the flyer.  And I sent off for the first copy of my first Dip zine.

At that point the zine wasn't named.  It was aimed specifically at Dip newbies (OK, newbies didn't exist back then, either).  It was published by Danny Collman.

I didn't know much about Danny then.  In fairness, I don't know much about him now.  But he's my hero.

One of the first thing he wanted us from-the-start contributors to do was name his zine.  I went for the name Proteus because, over the few issues the format kept changing.  I wasn't successful, though, and the zine became known as Springboard.

Danny opened my horizons.  I got involved in my first PBM game, and the excitement of playing against 6 other players, and of writing and receiving letters from them, especially waiting for them to come through the post, was thrilling.

Zines hosted games.  Danny's games were quite forgiving.  You sent him your orders, your press, and the zine game back with the posted results.  The only thing I found frustrating about this format in publishing was the predictive nature of what you might want to do as far as retreats and adjustments went.

The other frustrating thing about postal play, of course, was that it was common for letters to pass in the post.  I'd send a letter to another player, and receive a letter from him a couple of days later... which had no reference to what I'd sent because he had written at the same time I had!

But, well, so what?  I'm playing 7-player Diplomacy, ffs!  (This post is quickly filling with anachronisms.)

Part of Danny's reason for producing Springboard was that it introduced new players to the Hobby, specifically in the UK.  There was information on and about conventions in the UK, the EDC and WDC.  There were articles from eastablished Dippyists.  There were adverts for other zines.

After a while I jumped into it.  I subscribed to Dolchstoß, published by Richard Sharp.  I subscribed to Stephen Agar's Spring Offensive.  I think I subscribed to subscribed to another one but I can't remember which - sorry.

But, you know, life gets in the way.  I became more established in my profession, was promoted... and time disappeared.  And Diplomacy again faded away...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT IS DIPLOMACY? - Part 5: Variants

A variant is a game of Diplomacy where the rules or context are different from the standard game as designed by Allan B Calhamer.  There are three types of variants: context variants, map variants and rules variants. Context Variants Context variants are those games that are played with a wider context.  They may be tournament games, other scored games, or remote format  games.  These aren't often recognised as variants as such, as variants tend to be within the other two types discussed below.  But the context the game is being played in will have an impact on how some players will play the game, and so they are certainly a variation of Dip. Maybe they should be called "variations" rather than variants but does it really matter? Map Variants Diplomacy has been adapted to different maps, or boards.  Not surprising as the general idea of the game, pitting competing powers against each other in a localised region and time in history, can be adapte...

Tournament Scoring - Part 3: Draw Size Scoring (DSS)

If we're looking to score Diplomacy games based on the rules of the game, there are just three outcomes: a win, a draw, and a loss.  A scoring system based on these outcomes would therefore be based on whether the game was won, or whether it ended in a draw.  These systems are called Draw Size Scoring systems (DSS). The basic model for DSS systems is: The result is based on how the game ends only. If you win the game outright (solo), you take all the points in the game. If you are part of the draw at the end of the game, you receive the points avaialble in the game divided by the number of players in the draw. If you lose the game, you receive 0 (zero) points. The most basic version of this is the Calhamer Point system, designed by the great and good ABC himself.  If you soloed, you earned a point.  If you drew the game, you scored a number of points based on how many people you drew with.  So a 4-way draw would provide 0.25 points, a 5-way draw 0....

Tournament Scoring - Part 5: Other Scoring Systems

There are, perhaps, three other types of scoring system: Placement or Rank scoring, hybrid systems that seek to combine DSS and SCS, and Tier scoring systems.  I want to have a look at each system. Placement or Rank systems Essentially, these are Supply Centre Scoring systems with the addition of bonus points.  I'm going to have a look at some more regularly used systems.  Again, here is the map I will use as an example: England  - 12 SCs Russia  - 9 SCs Turkey  - 8 SCs Italy  - 5 SCs France ,  Germany   and  Austria-Hungary   were eliminated, with 0 SCs each. C-Diplo In a drawn game points are awarded for: Participating in the game: 1 (for an online tournament, I'd only award this for participating and not surrendering). Each SC held at the end of the game: 1 . The player that 'tops the board' (has the most SCs): 38 pts. The second placed player (second highest number of SCs): 14 pts. The third p...