Skip to main content

Beginning

Image
By
I'm not going to pretend I remember when I got my first Diplomacy game.  It was that long ago that, if I attempted to name a year I'd get it wrong.

It was published by Avallon Hill, though, and a typical UK/European board.  Russia was purple, England pink, France... well, what colour do you call that?  'Blue' seems to do a disservice to blue.


I was young enough that the closest I got to playing the game was with family.  This normally meant the 6-player version and involved me, my brother Steven, my parents, Uncle Alan and Auntie Margaret.  Dip games were few and far between because we also had Treasure of the Pharaohs, Game of Life, Monopoly (yawn), Anti-monoploly, Alarm... Board games were great.


There was one occasion when we got a 7-player game, one Christmas when Auntie Barbara was there.  The problem was that it took a long time to explain the rules to a new player.  I don't think we got very far into the game.


My game was special, though.  Russia had two sets of units; Germany didn't have any.  I found a pot of black acrylic paint from an Airfix set and painted one set of purple shells and ships black. 

Maybe it was this secretive Russian army which meant Germany never seemed to do well, often at the expense of Russia..?

In fairness, the Dip board saw more use when my brother and I played the 2-player game in school holidays.  This is more like Dip-chess, of course, but, well, it was as good a way to pass the time as any. 

I'm honestly not sure what sparked which interest.  Did Diplomacy spark my interest in history, so that I took history at A-level, or was my interest in history what attracted me to Diplomacy? 

Either way, one pushed my interest in the other.  I got an A grade in my A-level (the highest possible then) and I was sold on playing Dip... although I didn't know it yet. 

Time moved on, I got older, board games went down in my interests... they lacked boobs, after all.   I started some dead-end work, got bored, went to university and Dip faded from my life. 

Not for good, though.... 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

What do you think?

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT IS DIPLOMACY? - Part 5: Variants

By
A variant is a game of Diplomacy where the rules or context are different from the standard game as designed by Allan B Calhamer.  There are three types of variants: context variants, map variants and rules variants. Context Variants Context variants are those games that are played with a wider context.  They may be tournament games, other scored games, or remote format  games.  These aren't often recognised as variants as such, as variants tend to be within the other two types discussed below.  But the context the game is being played in will have an impact on how some players will play the game, and so they are certainly a variation of Dip. Maybe they should be called "variations" rather than variants but does it really matter? Map Variants Diplomacy has been adapted to different maps, or boards.  Not surprising as the general idea of the game, pitting competing powers against each other in a localised region and time in history, can be adapte...
Post a Comment
Read more

Tournament Scoring - Part 3: Draw Size Scoring (DSS)

By
If we're looking to score Diplomacy games based on the rules of the game, there are just three outcomes: a win, a draw, and a loss.  A scoring system based on these outcomes would therefore be based on whether the game was won, or whether it ended in a draw.  These systems are called Draw Size Scoring systems (DSS). The basic model for DSS systems is: The result is based on how the game ends only. If you win the game outright (solo), you take all the points in the game. If you are part of the draw at the end of the game, you receive the points avaialble in the game divided by the number of players in the draw. If you lose the game, you receive 0 (zero) points. The most basic version of this is the Calhamer Point system, designed by the great and good ABC himself.  If you soloed, you earned a point.  If you drew the game, you scored a number of points based on how many people you drew with.  So a 4-way draw would provide 0.25 points, a 5-way draw 0....
Post a Comment
Read more

Tournament Scoring - Part 2: What should a good scoring system do?

By
As I mentioned in the first post in this series , if you're playing in a tournament, you're playing a variant of Diplomacy.  This must be kept in mind when we're evaluating scoring systems.  The games are already variants so having them scored just means the variant aspect is increased. However, the scoring system should change the nature of the game as minimally as possible.  Ideally, even in the context of the variant you are playing - whether that variant is that the game is part of a tournament only, or whether it's being played online - the scoring system should try to meet the objectives of Diplomacy, not alter them. Objectives of Diplomacy The objective of the game is to win.  This means owning 18 SCs. If the game is unlikely to end in a solo victory, then the surviving players can end the game in a draw.  This means that players should be looking to survive in most cases, and certainly to be in a position to be part of the draw. Draws Inc...
Post a Comment
Read more