Skip to main content

Beginning

Image
By
I'm not going to pretend I remember when I got my first Diplomacy game.  It was that long ago that, if I attempted to name a year I'd get it wrong.

It was published by Avallon Hill, though, and a typical UK/European board.  Russia was purple, England pink, France... well, what colour do you call that?  'Blue' seems to do a disservice to blue.


I was young enough that the closest I got to playing the game was with family.  This normally meant the 6-player version and involved me, my brother Steven, my parents, Uncle Alan and Auntie Margaret.  Dip games were few and far between because we also had Treasure of the Pharaohs, Game of Life, Monopoly (yawn), Anti-monoploly, Alarm... Board games were great.


There was one occasion when we got a 7-player game, one Christmas when Auntie Barbara was there.  The problem was that it took a long time to explain the rules to a new player.  I don't think we got very far into the game.


My game was special, though.  Russia had two sets of units; Germany didn't have any.  I found a pot of black acrylic paint from an Airfix set and painted one set of purple shells and ships black. 

Maybe it was this secretive Russian army which meant Germany never seemed to do well, often at the expense of Russia..?

In fairness, the Dip board saw more use when my brother and I played the 2-player game in school holidays.  This is more like Dip-chess, of course, but, well, it was as good a way to pass the time as any. 

I'm honestly not sure what sparked which interest.  Did Diplomacy spark my interest in history, so that I took history at A-level, or was my interest in history what attracted me to Diplomacy? 

Either way, one pushed my interest in the other.  I got an A grade in my A-level (the highest possible then) and I was sold on playing Dip... although I didn't know it yet. 

Time moved on, I got older, board games went down in my interests... they lacked boobs, after all.   I started some dead-end work, got bored, went to university and Dip faded from my life. 

Not for good, though.... 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

What do you think?

Popular posts from this blog

Tournament Scoring - Part 5: Other Scoring Systems

By
There are, perhaps, three other types of scoring system: Placement or Rank scoring, hybrid systems that seek to combine DSS and SCS, and Tier scoring systems.  I want to have a look at each system. Placement or Rank systems Essentially, these are Supply Centre Scoring systems with the addition of bonus points.  I'm going to have a look at some more regularly used systems.  Again, here is the map I will use as an example: England  - 12 SCs Russia  - 9 SCs Turkey  - 8 SCs Italy  - 5 SCs France ,  Germany   and  Austria-Hungary   were eliminated, with 0 SCs each. C-Diplo In a drawn game points are awarded for: Participating in the game: 1 (for an online tournament, I'd only award this for participating and not surrendering). Each SC held at the end of the game: 1 . The player that 'tops the board' (has the most SCs): 38 pts. The second placed player (second highest number of SCs): 14 pts. The third placed player: 7 pts. If players are
Post a Comment
Read more

WHAT IS DIPLOMACY? - Part 5: Variants

By
A variant is a game of Diplomacy where the rules or context are different from the standard game as designed by Allan B Calhamer.  There are three types of variants: context variants, map variants and rules variants. Context Variants Context variants are those games that are played with a wider context.  They may be tournament games, other scored games, or remote format  games.  These aren't often recognised as variants as such, as variants tend to be within the other two types discussed below.  But the context the game is being played in will have an impact on how some players will play the game, and so they are certainly a variation of Dip. Maybe they should be called "variations" rather than variants but does it really matter? Map Variants Diplomacy has been adapted to different maps, or boards.  Not surprising as the general idea of the game, pitting competing powers against each other in a localised region and time in history, can be adapted to any number
Post a Comment
Read more

Tournament Scoring - Part 7: The Mystery Scoring System

By
Introducing the Mystery Scoring System.  This is a name that reflects that the actual points scored isn't known until the tournament is over. OK, enough.  Let's get to it.  Here's a breakdown of what the system looks like. The Mystery scoring system The Mystery scoring system is based on DIAS games, where all survivors share in the draw.  (I have modified it to work with non-DIAS games.) In a draw , all players involved in the draw score 100  points. For games which are non-DIAS, players that survive but who are not part of the draw receive 10 points. Eliminated players receive 0 points. If a game ends in a solo, all other players receive 0 points. Solos are scored using the following process: Find the sum of all points scored in games which end in a draw. Divide this total by the number of games that ended in the draw - the average number of points awarded. Divide the average number of points above by the number of games that ended in a solo. Each
Post a Comment
Read more