Skip to main content

The Ethics of Diplomacy - Part 5: Aliases

The online game is full of aliases.  If you join a website to play Diplomacy then you're asked to provide a username.  There's nothing wrong with that although it does, perhaps, take away something from the community of the Dip hobby.


As in most things, there's a history of this in postal Diplomacy and this is usually seen as a way to be anonymous.

With online play, however, it may be possible to change your username.  This might be simply because you realised the name you chose was not a good choice.  For instance, a number of players may use a version of their email address which may not be the best idea.  If you come across someone who is an idiot who thinks it's acceptable to harass players off-site then using your email address could be a mistake.

Sometimes it's realising that the name you chose really does you no favours.  I come across this every day at work.  I deal with younger people who don't necessarily think much about what they should put in an email address.  One address that sticks in my head started with 'fannylane'.  It doesn't really matter whether you're British or American, calling yourself 'fanny' isn't a fantastic idea.  (In this case, there was a reason: Fanny Lane was his address... although an unfortunate one.)

Online, occasionally, you come across usernames which show a similar mentality.  The name is meant as a joke, usually, but the player realises that, actually, it wasn't the greatest idea.  More embarrassing than funny.

Sometimes, though, players simply want to change their usernames as a form of anonymity.  To some extent, this is the reasoning behind usernames.  It allows you to play online without giving out personal details.  Nothing wrong with this, especially as there are a number of people who will use those details for criminal reasons.

However, they want to change the name regularly.  This may be because they've earned some success and are therefore being targeted.  It may be that they're a prominent member of the community and they're experiencing some targeting.

It may be that they've played badly using one name.  They might have been a quitter, one of those people who leave a game at the first sign of a problem.  No resilience.  But they then realise that they're doing themselves no good by acting like this and they resolve to change.  Part of that change might be that they want to change their name.

The question of anonymity is that it can simply cause confusion.  Many sites offer players the option to play anonymously.  You can hide your identity while the games running.  Excellent.  Don't need to change your username then.

Some people think that a player shouldn't be able to hide from their past mistakes.  And, often, while you can change your username, your record goes with you.  This means that, no matter how many times you change your name, you can't escape your record.

On the other hand, how many times do people research the players they're up against?  Changing your username might be enough to hide your infamy.

Personally, I don't think there's anything wrong with being able to change your username, providing that it isn't allowed when you're playing a game (which would be overly confusing for players in the game) and that you're not allowed to change your name too many times.  There are genuine reasons why a player may want to change their name.  Rarely do these reasons need regular changes.


THE ETHICS OF DIPLOMACY series:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tournament Scoring - Part 5: Other Scoring Systems

There are, perhaps, three other types of scoring system: Placement or Rank scoring, hybrid systems that seek to combine DSS and SCS, and Tier scoring systems.  I want to have a look at each system. Placement or Rank systems Essentially, these are Supply Centre Scoring systems with the addition of bonus points.  I'm going to have a look at some more regularly used systems.  Again, here is the map I will use as an example: England  - 12 SCs Russia  - 9 SCs Turkey  - 8 SCs Italy  - 5 SCs France ,  Germany   and  Austria-Hungary   were eliminated, with 0 SCs each. C-Diplo In a drawn game points are awarded for: Participating in the game: 1 (for an online tournament, I'd only award this for participating and not surrendering). Each SC held at the end of the game: 1 . The player that 'tops the board' (has the most SCs): 38 pts. The second placed player (second highest number of SCs): 14 pts. The third placed player: 7 pts. If players are

WHAT IS DIPLOMACY? - Part 5: Variants

A variant is a game of Diplomacy where the rules or context are different from the standard game as designed by Allan B Calhamer.  There are three types of variants: context variants, map variants and rules variants. Context Variants Context variants are those games that are played with a wider context.  They may be tournament games, other scored games, or remote format  games.  These aren't often recognised as variants as such, as variants tend to be within the other two types discussed below.  But the context the game is being played in will have an impact on how some players will play the game, and so they are certainly a variation of Dip. Maybe they should be called "variations" rather than variants but does it really matter? Map Variants Diplomacy has been adapted to different maps, or boards.  Not surprising as the general idea of the game, pitting competing powers against each other in a localised region and time in history, can be adapted to any number

The Ethics of Diplomacy - Part 9: Mind Games

I've separated this from gamesmanship because it is something different.  However, mind games have the same impact on the Dip community as gamesmanship, for very similar reasons. Mind games are anything that you can do to get under the skin of another player.  They can be irritants, impoliteness or meant to simply build paranoia. Silence Sending messages and getting no response is frustrating.  I know - I send a lot of messages and find it annoying if I'm getting nothing back from someone with whom I'm supposed to be working. Now, what happens when that silence is  deliberate ?  When someone decides that they're not going to answer messages, or keep their answers to a minimum?  Why would they do  that ? Well, it is usually to cause some disruption in your thinking.  If you're concerned that she isn't messaging back, you're going to be concerned about what your plans were going to be. I know at least one player who hates this, not becaus