Skip to main content

The Ethics of Diplomacy - Part 5: Aliases

The online game is full of aliases.  If you join a website to play Diplomacy then you're asked to provide a username.  There's nothing wrong with that although it does, perhaps, take away something from the community of the Dip hobby.


As in most things, there's a history of this in postal Diplomacy and this is usually seen as a way to be anonymous.

With online play, however, it may be possible to change your username.  This might be simply because you realised the name you chose was not a good choice.  For instance, a number of players may use a version of their email address which may not be the best idea.  If you come across someone who is an idiot who thinks it's acceptable to harass players off-site then using your email address could be a mistake.

Sometimes it's realising that the name you chose really does you no favours.  I come across this every day at work.  I deal with younger people who don't necessarily think much about what they should put in an email address.  One address that sticks in my head started with 'fannylane'.  It doesn't really matter whether you're British or American, calling yourself 'fanny' isn't a fantastic idea.  (In this case, there was a reason: Fanny Lane was his address... although an unfortunate one.)

Online, occasionally, you come across usernames which show a similar mentality.  The name is meant as a joke, usually, but the player realises that, actually, it wasn't the greatest idea.  More embarrassing than funny.

Sometimes, though, players simply want to change their usernames as a form of anonymity.  To some extent, this is the reasoning behind usernames.  It allows you to play online without giving out personal details.  Nothing wrong with this, especially as there are a number of people who will use those details for criminal reasons.

However, they want to change the name regularly.  This may be because they've earned some success and are therefore being targeted.  It may be that they're a prominent member of the community and they're experiencing some targeting.

It may be that they've played badly using one name.  They might have been a quitter, one of those people who leave a game at the first sign of a problem.  No resilience.  But they then realise that they're doing themselves no good by acting like this and they resolve to change.  Part of that change might be that they want to change their name.

The question of anonymity is that it can simply cause confusion.  Many sites offer players the option to play anonymously.  You can hide your identity while the games running.  Excellent.  Don't need to change your username then.

Some people think that a player shouldn't be able to hide from their past mistakes.  And, often, while you can change your username, your record goes with you.  This means that, no matter how many times you change your name, you can't escape your record.

On the other hand, how many times do people research the players they're up against?  Changing your username might be enough to hide your infamy.

Personally, I don't think there's anything wrong with being able to change your username, providing that it isn't allowed when you're playing a game (which would be overly confusing for players in the game) and that you're not allowed to change your name too many times.  There are genuine reasons why a player may want to change their name.  Rarely do these reasons need regular changes.


THE ETHICS OF DIPLOMACY series:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tournament Scoring - Part 5: Other Scoring Systems

There are, perhaps, three other types of scoring system: Placement or Rank scoring, hybrid systems that seek to combine DSS and SCS, and Tier scoring systems.  I want to have a look at each system. Placement or Rank systems Essentially, these are Supply Centre Scoring systems with the addition of bonus points.  I'm going to have a look at some more regularly used systems.  Again, here is the map I will use as an example: England  - 12 SCs Russia  - 9 SCs Turkey  - 8 SCs Italy  - 5 SCs France ,  Germany   and  Austria-Hungary   were eliminated, with 0 SCs each. C-Diplo In a drawn game points are awarded for: Participating in the game: 1 (for an online tournament, I'd only award this for participating and not surrendering). Each SC held at the end of the game: 1 . The player that 'tops the board' (has the most SCs): 38 pts. The second placed player (second highest number of SCs): 14 pts. The third p...

The Embassy Journal

You know, I have realised that I probably bang on too much.  What can I say?  I like the sound of my own writing (my voice, until laryngitis kicks in when I begin to sound like Barry White, is slightly too high pitched and squeaky). This led me to realise that I should probably be looking at different ways to put out what I want to put that's longer-winded than the long-winded stuff I publish here. And so The Embassy Journal was born. This is my zine, written to accompany the blog, but with articles and a smattering of other stuff.  You can get it from the link above, which will lead you to the first issue (March 2020).  Let me know what you think. All issues will be published on The Embassy Journal page on this blog, where you can also find subscription and contribution info.

The Ethics of Diplomacy - Part 8: Gamesmanship

This is a sticky one, frankly.  If you want to win a game of Diplomacy what isn't allowed?  Some of the stuff that isn't allowed should be obvious and I've discussed much of it in previous posts in this series.  That leaves things that you can do to win that are questionable and, in the final analysis, come down to personal choice. How far are you prepared to go to win at Diplomacy ?  That is probably what defines whether you think something is "gamesmanship" or not, and whether you think it is acceptable. Slow Play Some players in the online game are what I call Pussycats .  They want to play as quickly as possible and they want to move the game on.  Some will hassle through Public Press.  "Has everyone finalised yet?" "Who hasn't finalised?" "Come on - FINALISE!!!" Now this, itself, is something that becomes annoying.  If you join a game with certain deadlines, you need to expect to play to those deadlines.  If you...