Skip to main content

Who you'll meet across a Diplomacy board - Part 7: Deal With It!

I play Diplomacy because I enjoy the game.  I don't always enjoy playing against the people I'm in a game with, and I sometimes get wound up by the people I come across within Dip communities.  But the game is great - the King of Games indeed.

It is a game which comes with a certain amount of stress.  It's a game, though, and in the end it should be something from which you can walk away.  I don't mean quitting an on-going game - that's abhorrent unless it's the most difficult of circumstances.  I mean it's something where you can close the message window, close the game, close the forum, and get on with every day life.



But it is also true that a game can get frustrating when players exhibit attributes that don't fit in with your personal ideas about how to play the game.  So I want to end this series with some advice about how to deal with this situation.

What it boils down to is that players can, within the rules, do whatever they like.  Some of it you may find distasteful, some of it honourable.  It doesn't matter.  They - and you - can play in any way.

Dealing with it means accepting this fact.  It is - to a large extent - out of your control.  You can try to persuade them that they're not playing as you think they should but that often has a negative impact.  So don't do that unless you think they may waver and then try to be a little sensitive to how they're receiving your sage advice.

Often a better strategy is to accept what you can't control and focus on what you can control.  That is your game, your relationships with other players.  Focus on that, an perhaps you'll be able to get something out of the situation.

It's the same with everyday life.  Things happen that are out of our control.  Events take place that can throw us and it's easy to focus on the negative outcome rather than looking at that outcome and finding a way to deal with it.  It's about accepting the situation and working with it or around it.

When the game's over, you should then look back at what happened and look at what you might have done differently - hopefully, not much!  Hopefully you'll have won the game and that is usually a situation that doesn't need a lot of improvement on.

But if you reflect on what happened, finding ways to change the things that didn't go well (there's always something) and working out how to avoid that happening again, you're making progress.  And, no matter why we're playing Dip, we all want to get better at it and enjoy it more.

WHO YOU'LL MEET ACROSS A DIPLOMACY BOARD series:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT IS DIPLOMACY? - Part 5: Variants

A variant is a game of Diplomacy where the rules or context are different from the standard game as designed by Allan B Calhamer.  There are three types of variants: context variants, map variants and rules variants. Context Variants Context variants are those games that are played with a wider context.  They may be tournament games, other scored games, or remote format  games.  These aren't often recognised as variants as such, as variants tend to be within the other two types discussed below.  But the context the game is being played in will have an impact on how some players will play the game, and so they are certainly a variation of Dip. Maybe they should be called "variations" rather than variants but does it really matter? Map Variants Diplomacy has been adapted to different maps, or boards.  Not surprising as the general idea of the game, pitting competing powers against each other in a localised region and time in history, can be adapte...

Tournament Scoring - Part 3: Draw Size Scoring (DSS)

If we're looking to score Diplomacy games based on the rules of the game, there are just three outcomes: a win, a draw, and a loss.  A scoring system based on these outcomes would therefore be based on whether the game was won, or whether it ended in a draw.  These systems are called Draw Size Scoring systems (DSS). The basic model for DSS systems is: The result is based on how the game ends only. If you win the game outright (solo), you take all the points in the game. If you are part of the draw at the end of the game, you receive the points avaialble in the game divided by the number of players in the draw. If you lose the game, you receive 0 (zero) points. The most basic version of this is the Calhamer Point system, designed by the great and good ABC himself.  If you soloed, you earned a point.  If you drew the game, you scored a number of points based on how many people you drew with.  So a 4-way draw would provide 0.25 points, a 5-way draw 0....

Tournament Scoring - Part 2: What should a good scoring system do?

As I mentioned in the first post in this series , if you're playing in a tournament, you're playing a variant of Diplomacy.  This must be kept in mind when we're evaluating scoring systems.  The games are already variants so having them scored just means the variant aspect is increased. However, the scoring system should change the nature of the game as minimally as possible.  Ideally, even in the context of the variant you are playing - whether that variant is that the game is part of a tournament only, or whether it's being played online - the scoring system should try to meet the objectives of Diplomacy, not alter them. Objectives of Diplomacy The objective of the game is to win.  This means owning 18 SCs. If the game is unlikely to end in a solo victory, then the surviving players can end the game in a draw.  This means that players should be looking to survive in most cases, and certainly to be in a position to be part of the draw. Draws Inc...