Skip to main content

Who you'll meet across a Diplomacy board - Part 7: Deal With It!

I play Diplomacy because I enjoy the game.  I don't always enjoy playing against the people I'm in a game with, and I sometimes get wound up by the people I come across within Dip communities.  But the game is great - the King of Games indeed.

It is a game which comes with a certain amount of stress.  It's a game, though, and in the end it should be something from which you can walk away.  I don't mean quitting an on-going game - that's abhorrent unless it's the most difficult of circumstances.  I mean it's something where you can close the message window, close the game, close the forum, and get on with every day life.



But it is also true that a game can get frustrating when players exhibit attributes that don't fit in with your personal ideas about how to play the game.  So I want to end this series with some advice about how to deal with this situation.

What it boils down to is that players can, within the rules, do whatever they like.  Some of it you may find distasteful, some of it honourable.  It doesn't matter.  They - and you - can play in any way.

Dealing with it means accepting this fact.  It is - to a large extent - out of your control.  You can try to persuade them that they're not playing as you think they should but that often has a negative impact.  So don't do that unless you think they may waver and then try to be a little sensitive to how they're receiving your sage advice.

Often a better strategy is to accept what you can't control and focus on what you can control.  That is your game, your relationships with other players.  Focus on that, an perhaps you'll be able to get something out of the situation.

It's the same with everyday life.  Things happen that are out of our control.  Events take place that can throw us and it's easy to focus on the negative outcome rather than looking at that outcome and finding a way to deal with it.  It's about accepting the situation and working with it or around it.

When the game's over, you should then look back at what happened and look at what you might have done differently - hopefully, not much!  Hopefully you'll have won the game and that is usually a situation that doesn't need a lot of improvement on.

But if you reflect on what happened, finding ways to change the things that didn't go well (there's always something) and working out how to avoid that happening again, you're making progress.  And, no matter why we're playing Dip, we all want to get better at it and enjoy it more.

WHO YOU'LL MEET ACROSS A DIPLOMACY BOARD series:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT IS DIPLOMACY? - Part 5: Variants

A variant is a game of Diplomacy where the rules or context are different from the standard game as designed by Allan B Calhamer.  There are three types of variants: context variants, map variants and rules variants. Context Variants Context variants are those games that are played with a wider context.  They may be tournament games, other scored games, or remote format  games.  These aren't often recognised as variants as such, as variants tend to be within the other two types discussed below.  But the context the game is being played in will have an impact on how some players will play the game, and so they are certainly a variation of Dip. Maybe they should be called "variations" rather than variants but does it really matter? Map Variants Diplomacy has been adapted to different maps, or boards.  Not surprising as the general idea of the game, pitting competing powers against each other in a localised region and time in history, can be adapte...

WHAT IS DIPLOMACY? - Part 1: A Brief Intro to Diplomacy

Let's get started by discussing the game itself. The Board The map Diplomacy is played on is based on Europe at the start of the Twentieth Century.  It doesn't reflect Europe literally but is stylised.  Not all the countries are there and some of the spaces are given names that are a little... questionable. The Diplomacy Board The map I've used above is something   like the original board published in Europe.  In the Americas (well, North America, I'm not sure about anywhere outside of USA and Canada) the map was less colourful and more a physical map.  But the spaces are roughly the same. Players control one of seven major powers in Europe: England (yes, not Britain or, even more accurately, the UK) France Italy Germany Austria-Hungary (usually shortened to Austria) Turkey Russia There are 56 land spaces.  34 of these spaces are called Supply Centres (SCs) that, when controlled by a major power, support an army or a fleet on ...

The Powers - Part 6: Walls of Steel

In this series, I'm going to take a brief look at the seven powers in the game of  Diplomacy.   This will be not much more than a brief introduction to each power, looking at their position on the board, their neighbours and the pros and cons of playing them.  More detailed strategy will follow in future posts. The witch in the east.  England and Turkey are often know as the "Witch of the East" and the "Witch of the West" respectively.  They are both incredibly difficult to eliminate, which earns them this sobriquet.  With England, of course, it's because she's surrounded by sea spaces and will - or should - have a number of fleets on the board to protect her.  With Turkey it is that she's always slow to break down.  Even with a Gobbler triple alliance (A/I/R) it takes time. One of the reasons for this is Turkey's position as a corner power.  You can't get in behind her... literally in this case. Turkey's most vulnera...