Skip to main content

Who you'll meet across a Diplomacy board - Part 7: Deal With It!

I play Diplomacy because I enjoy the game.  I don't always enjoy playing against the people I'm in a game with, and I sometimes get wound up by the people I come across within Dip communities.  But the game is great - the King of Games indeed.

It is a game which comes with a certain amount of stress.  It's a game, though, and in the end it should be something from which you can walk away.  I don't mean quitting an on-going game - that's abhorrent unless it's the most difficult of circumstances.  I mean it's something where you can close the message window, close the game, close the forum, and get on with every day life.



But it is also true that a game can get frustrating when players exhibit attributes that don't fit in with your personal ideas about how to play the game.  So I want to end this series with some advice about how to deal with this situation.

What it boils down to is that players can, within the rules, do whatever they like.  Some of it you may find distasteful, some of it honourable.  It doesn't matter.  They - and you - can play in any way.

Dealing with it means accepting this fact.  It is - to a large extent - out of your control.  You can try to persuade them that they're not playing as you think they should but that often has a negative impact.  So don't do that unless you think they may waver and then try to be a little sensitive to how they're receiving your sage advice.

Often a better strategy is to accept what you can't control and focus on what you can control.  That is your game, your relationships with other players.  Focus on that, an perhaps you'll be able to get something out of the situation.

It's the same with everyday life.  Things happen that are out of our control.  Events take place that can throw us and it's easy to focus on the negative outcome rather than looking at that outcome and finding a way to deal with it.  It's about accepting the situation and working with it or around it.

When the game's over, you should then look back at what happened and look at what you might have done differently - hopefully, not much!  Hopefully you'll have won the game and that is usually a situation that doesn't need a lot of improvement on.

But if you reflect on what happened, finding ways to change the things that didn't go well (there's always something) and working out how to avoid that happening again, you're making progress.  And, no matter why we're playing Dip, we all want to get better at it and enjoy it more.

WHO YOU'LL MEET ACROSS A DIPLOMACY BOARD series:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tournament Scoring - Part 4: Supply Centre Scoring

The thing with tournaments is that a lot of games end in a draw.  This means that DSS systems aren't necessarily going to produce a great result because a lot of players could well finish on the same score.  An alternative to DSS is a  Supply Centre Scoring  (SCS) system. I'm going to use the game above as an example to explain SCS systems.  (The game is from Playdiplomacy and so the colours are different from those I use for my maps.)  The game ended with the following outcome: England - 12 SCs Russia - 9 SCs Turkey - 8 SCs Italy - 5 SCs France , Germany and Austria-Hungary were eliminated, with 0 SCs each. Supply Centre Scoring systems are based on the number of SCs the players owned at the end of the game.  The basic pattern is: A solo results in all the points available.  No other player scores points. A draw will be scored using the number of SCs the players hold at the end of the game.  In the above game, on ...

WHAT IS DIPLOMACY? - Part 5: Variants

A variant is a game of Diplomacy where the rules or context are different from the standard game as designed by Allan B Calhamer.  There are three types of variants: context variants, map variants and rules variants. Context Variants Context variants are those games that are played with a wider context.  They may be tournament games, other scored games, or remote format  games.  These aren't often recognised as variants as such, as variants tend to be within the other two types discussed below.  But the context the game is being played in will have an impact on how some players will play the game, and so they are certainly a variation of Dip. Maybe they should be called "variations" rather than variants but does it really matter? Map Variants Diplomacy has been adapted to different maps, or boards.  Not surprising as the general idea of the game, pitting competing powers against each other in a localised region and time in history, can be adapte...

Tournament Scoring - Part 1: Tournament Games are Variants

Tournaments have come to be a big part of Diplomacy, whether face-to-face or online.  If you're running a tournament you need to be able to find a winner, and so a scoring system has to be introduced.  In this series of posts I'm going to look at different types of scoring systems and discuss the pros and cons of each one.  And I'll end the series by discussing my own, as yet, prototype system. The first thing to be aware of is that a scoring system will change the way people play the game.  It has to do.  If you're playing and you need to do well then you need to play to the system.  This means that the way the system affects the way Diplomacy is played. Tournament games are already a variant of Dip.  Ideally, they wouldn't be.  Players would be able to play x  number of games and play them as they would any other game.  In FTF play, you'd expect the game to run until they're finished or time runs out.  Online, there should ...