Skip to main content

Back for Good..?

Eventually, I was able to move into the modern world.  I got a PC.  Yep, a real computer.  And I got t'internet.

Even more eventually I wondered: What will I find if I search for Diplomacy on the web?  So I searched and the first return of note was Play Diplomacy Online.


So, I wasn't impressed with the map used back when I joined.  But, you know what, it was only the map.  The game system worked.  The game was easy to access.  It didn't have a long, long wait for things to happen.  And I could play live games against people.

I think PlayDip was about a year old back then.  Not everything ran smoothly.  But it improved - massively.  The map is now pretty looking, there are interesting variants available on the main site, the ranking system is much better than the old one, games are interesting and varied.

For me, though, it's always been the Forum that has interested me as much as playing Dip.  The discussion about Diplomacy there is amazing.

did spread my wings a bit.  I joined webDiplomacy and tried that site.  I have to say that, way back then, I was put off by two things.

At that point webDip's forum was awful.  This was both in the way it was presented (which has changed today) but also in the posts there.  At that time (maybe not so much now) the 'loud' people were often pretty ascerbic (understatement).

There was also a problem on one of the variant games, where there was a bug on the map.  I reported it, like a good little player, and one of the Moderators came back with something along the lines of: This is a known bug.  If you want to get rid of it, go and reprogramme it.  Having come from a site where Mods actually did something about bugs to one where - then - they weren't interested was a bit of a shock.

If your site's Mods don't give a toss, I guess that's reflected by the site's membership, at least in part.  I can't stress enough, though, that was then.  It seems to be a better site now.

I've also been to other sites.  I've at least visited every site on my menu under Dip Links - Play.  The only other site I've really played for any time on is Stabbeurfou which is a French/English site.  Didn't particularly like the messaging systems there, have to say.

Occasionally I get Dip-fatigue and have to stop myself playing for a while.  There have also been times when ill health, or family issues, have got in the way and taken me away from this great hobby.  But, generally, with the ease of accessing Diplomacy at my fingertips, I'm here to stay.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tournament Scoring - Part 5: Other Scoring Systems

There are, perhaps, three other types of scoring system: Placement or Rank scoring, hybrid systems that seek to combine DSS and SCS, and Tier scoring systems.  I want to have a look at each system. Placement or Rank systems Essentially, these are Supply Centre Scoring systems with the addition of bonus points.  I'm going to have a look at some more regularly used systems.  Again, here is the map I will use as an example: England  - 12 SCs Russia  - 9 SCs Turkey  - 8 SCs Italy  - 5 SCs France ,  Germany   and  Austria-Hungary   were eliminated, with 0 SCs each. C-Diplo In a drawn game points are awarded for: Participating in the game: 1 (for an online tournament, I'd only award this for participating and not surrendering). Each SC held at the end of the game: 1 . The player that 'tops the board' (has the most SCs): 38 pts. The second placed player (second highest number of SCs): 14 pts. The third placed player: 7 pts. If players are

The Ethics of Diplomacy - Part 9: Mind Games

I've separated this from gamesmanship because it is something different.  However, mind games have the same impact on the Dip community as gamesmanship, for very similar reasons. Mind games are anything that you can do to get under the skin of another player.  They can be irritants, impoliteness or meant to simply build paranoia. Silence Sending messages and getting no response is frustrating.  I know - I send a lot of messages and find it annoying if I'm getting nothing back from someone with whom I'm supposed to be working. Now, what happens when that silence is  deliberate ?  When someone decides that they're not going to answer messages, or keep their answers to a minimum?  Why would they do  that ? Well, it is usually to cause some disruption in your thinking.  If you're concerned that she isn't messaging back, you're going to be concerned about what your plans were going to be. I know at least one player who hates this, not becaus

Tournament Scoring - Part 7: The Mystery Scoring System

Introducing the Mystery Scoring System.  This is a name that reflects that the actual points scored isn't known until the tournament is over. OK, enough.  Let's get to it.  Here's a breakdown of what the system looks like. The Mystery scoring system The Mystery scoring system is based on DIAS games, where all survivors share in the draw.  (I have modified it to work with non-DIAS games.) In a draw , all players involved in the draw score 100  points. For games which are non-DIAS, players that survive but who are not part of the draw receive 10 points. Eliminated players receive 0 points. If a game ends in a solo, all other players receive 0 points. Solos are scored using the following process: Find the sum of all points scored in games which end in a draw. Divide this total by the number of games that ended in the draw - the average number of points awarded. Divide the average number of points above by the number of games that ended in a solo. Each