Skip to main content

Back for Good..?

Eventually, I was able to move into the modern world.  I got a PC.  Yep, a real computer.  And I got t'internet.

Even more eventually I wondered: What will I find if I search for Diplomacy on the web?  So I searched and the first return of note was Play Diplomacy Online.


So, I wasn't impressed with the map used back when I joined.  But, you know what, it was only the map.  The game system worked.  The game was easy to access.  It didn't have a long, long wait for things to happen.  And I could play live games against people.

I think PlayDip was about a year old back then.  Not everything ran smoothly.  But it improved - massively.  The map is now pretty looking, there are interesting variants available on the main site, the ranking system is much better than the old one, games are interesting and varied.

For me, though, it's always been the Forum that has interested me as much as playing Dip.  The discussion about Diplomacy there is amazing.

did spread my wings a bit.  I joined webDiplomacy and tried that site.  I have to say that, way back then, I was put off by two things.

At that point webDip's forum was awful.  This was both in the way it was presented (which has changed today) but also in the posts there.  At that time (maybe not so much now) the 'loud' people were often pretty ascerbic (understatement).

There was also a problem on one of the variant games, where there was a bug on the map.  I reported it, like a good little player, and one of the Moderators came back with something along the lines of: This is a known bug.  If you want to get rid of it, go and reprogramme it.  Having come from a site where Mods actually did something about bugs to one where - then - they weren't interested was a bit of a shock.

If your site's Mods don't give a toss, I guess that's reflected by the site's membership, at least in part.  I can't stress enough, though, that was then.  It seems to be a better site now.

I've also been to other sites.  I've at least visited every site on my menu under Dip Links - Play.  The only other site I've really played for any time on is Stabbeurfou which is a French/English site.  Didn't particularly like the messaging systems there, have to say.

Occasionally I get Dip-fatigue and have to stop myself playing for a while.  There have also been times when ill health, or family issues, have got in the way and taken me away from this great hobby.  But, generally, with the ease of accessing Diplomacy at my fingertips, I'm here to stay.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tournament Scoring - Part 5: Other Scoring Systems

There are, perhaps, three other types of scoring system: Placement or Rank scoring, hybrid systems that seek to combine DSS and SCS, and Tier scoring systems.  I want to have a look at each system. Placement or Rank systems Essentially, these are Supply Centre Scoring systems with the addition of bonus points.  I'm going to have a look at some more regularly used systems.  Again, here is the map I will use as an example: England  - 12 SCs Russia  - 9 SCs Turkey  - 8 SCs Italy  - 5 SCs France ,  Germany   and  Austria-Hungary   were eliminated, with 0 SCs each. C-Diplo In a drawn game points are awarded for: Participating in the game: 1 (for an online tournament, I'd only award this for participating and not surrendering). Each SC held at the end of the game: 1 . The player that 'tops the board' (has the most SCs): 38 pts. The second placed player (second highest number of SCs): 14 pts. The third p...

The Embassy Journal

You know, I have realised that I probably bang on too much.  What can I say?  I like the sound of my own writing (my voice, until laryngitis kicks in when I begin to sound like Barry White, is slightly too high pitched and squeaky). This led me to realise that I should probably be looking at different ways to put out what I want to put that's longer-winded than the long-winded stuff I publish here. And so The Embassy Journal was born. This is my zine, written to accompany the blog, but with articles and a smattering of other stuff.  You can get it from the link above, which will lead you to the first issue (March 2020).  Let me know what you think. All issues will be published on The Embassy Journal page on this blog, where you can also find subscription and contribution info.

The Ethics of Diplomacy - Part 8: Gamesmanship

This is a sticky one, frankly.  If you want to win a game of Diplomacy what isn't allowed?  Some of the stuff that isn't allowed should be obvious and I've discussed much of it in previous posts in this series.  That leaves things that you can do to win that are questionable and, in the final analysis, come down to personal choice. How far are you prepared to go to win at Diplomacy ?  That is probably what defines whether you think something is "gamesmanship" or not, and whether you think it is acceptable. Slow Play Some players in the online game are what I call Pussycats .  They want to play as quickly as possible and they want to move the game on.  Some will hassle through Public Press.  "Has everyone finalised yet?" "Who hasn't finalised?" "Come on - FINALISE!!!" Now this, itself, is something that becomes annoying.  If you join a game with certain deadlines, you need to expect to play to those deadlines.  If you...